Legal Opinion

Bruner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1929No. A-7023PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted for having in his possession a quantity of intoxicating liquor, to wit, choc-taw beer, with the unlawful intent and purpose to sell, give away, and otherwise furnish same to others, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50.

Motion for new trial was filed, considered, and overruled. The case was appealed to this court.

The testimony of the state, in substance, tended to* show that the defendant in error had in his possession choctaw beer. No analysis of the beer was made. Two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Beatty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Lumpkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Leigh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Doser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Savalier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Seay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API