Legal Opinion

Drew v. Northwestern Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 7, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Service of the summons in this case on the foreign corporate defendant was made by delivery thereof to the person in whose possession property of the defendant was found available for attachment. Section 48 of the Municipal Court Code, in so *707far as it authorizes such service upon a non-resident defendant, is unconstitutional. (Nerenberg v. Keith, 101 Misc. 551.) The fact that tangible property was levied on by the marshal would not change the situation. The test of the constitutionality of the statute is what might be done under its terms, not what was done in a particular case. , ***

Order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nurenberg v. KeithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. L. Arbetter, Inc. v. IsabelCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  2. Mayefsky v. DavisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API