Blakeley v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Cake 53 — Action by J'oiin O. Adams against W. H. Blakeley and Hbttie S. Blakeley Upon a Promissory Note and to Enforce a Mortgage Lien. APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendants Appeal. Appellee in his petition alleges that the consideration of the note for $3,908.35 sued on, was the payment by him as surety for appellants and upon no part of which lie was bound except as surety.
Read the full summary
Cake 53 — Action by J'oiin O. Adams against W. H. Blakeley and Hbttie S. Blakeley Upon a Promissory Note and to Enforce a Mortgage Lien. APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendants Appeal. Appellee in his petition alleges that the consideration of the note for $3,908.35 sued on, was the payment by him as surety for appellants and upon no part of which lie was bound except as surety. Mrs. Blakeley, in her answer pleads that she signed the note to Adams, as surety for her husband and that Adams knew it and denies that the note was given for anything Adams had paid as…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the cotjbt by
JUDGE BUR.NAM.
This action was brought by the appellee, John O. Adams, against W. II. Blakeley and wife, Hettie S. Blakeley, upon a note for $0,908.35, dated April 3, 1900, and due one year after date, and secured by a mortgage upon three separate tracts of land. He alleges that the consideration of the note was the payment by him of judgments which were rendered against him as security for the defendants in the case of J. C. Adams v. W. H. Blakeley, etc., in favor of P. J. Potter & Son for $1,550, the Warren Deposit Bank for $830. Potter, Matlock & Co. for $497, T. J.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kendall v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Fitzpatrick v. Apperson's ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
- Romig v. RomigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
- Hart v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
- Witmer v. SchlatterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Briggs v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Deatly v. RallsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881