Legal Opinion

Yurman Studio, Inc. v. Castaneda

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 19, 2008No. 07 Civ. 1241 (SAS), 07 Civ. 7862 (SAS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Yurman Studio, Inc., Yurman Design, Inc. (collectively, “Yurman”), Cartier, a division of Richemont North America, Inc., Cartier International, N.V., Cartier Creation Studio, S.A. (collectively, “Cartier”), Gucci America, Inc. (“Gucci”), and Bulgari S.p.A. (“Bulgari”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) move for partial summary judgment against Ejeweler LLC and Elena Castaneda (collectively “defendants”) with respect to all issues of liability and damages relating to certain of their claims for infringement of trademarks, copyrights…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, Inc. v. Security University, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. GMA Accessories, Inc. v. BOP, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. Filene's Basement, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. Otto v. Hearst Commc'ns, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API