Legal Opinion

Thrailkill v. Amsted Industries Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 31, 2000No. 99-4244-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAUGHREY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mike Thrailkill and Donald Teasdale, are former employees of Defendant the MacWhyte Company (“MacWhyte”). Plaintiffs brought this suit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging that MacWhyte and other Defendants 1 enticed them into accepting lower wages in exchange for benefits under the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). Plaintiffs have asserted various state law claims as well a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Pending before the Court is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Isna Wica Owayawa v. American United Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
  2. Little Wound School v. American United Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
  3. Stewart v. Pershing Health SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API