Legal Opinion

McDonald v. City of Akron

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1993No. 15710PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

On December 28, 1987, plaintiff-appellant, Eloise McDonald, was involved in a multiple-car accident. As a result of the accident, McDonald suffered serious injuries. McDonald settled the claims with the other drivers.

McDonald filed suit against defendant-appellee, the city of Akron, alleging that a traffic signal at the intersection where the accident occurred malfunctioned. McDonald further alleged that the city had notice of the malfunction and failed to correct it. The city responded and denied that it had notice of the problem, if there were in fact a malfunction.

The case was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Apaydin v. Cleveland Clinic FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Crane v. NuttleCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Schutte v. FitzgibbonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API