Legal Opinion
Smith v. Intex Recreation Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided February 1, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-305-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS
JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on motion of defendant Intex Recreation Corp. to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative to transfer this matter to the Central District of California, and a motion to dismiss Count II of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Timely opposition has been filed. Oral argument is not necessary. Subject matter jurisdiction is allegedly based upon diversity of citizenship.
Plaintiff alleges that in 1986 he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asarco, Inc. And Hansa Marine Insurance Co., Etc. v. Glenara, Ltd. And Anglo-Eastern Management Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leys v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Smith v. Intex Recreation DCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994