Legal Opinion

Oswald & Hess Co. v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1945No. 49PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Judge.

Complainant Oswald and Hess Company describes itself as “a medium sized meat packing plant”, engaged in “the general meat packing business” at Pittsburgh, Pa.

On August 20, 1942, complainant filed a protest under § 203 of the Emergency Price Control Act, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 923, against Maximum Price Regulation No. 169 — Beef and Veal Carcasses and Wholesale Cuts (7 F.R. 4653). After extended proceedings, the Administrator on May 4, 1943, issued an order denying the protest in so far as relief was not found in the provisions of Revised Maximum Price Regulation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armour & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Superior Packing Co. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Atlantic Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Federated Meat Corp. v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Armour & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. United States v. Mayfair Meat Packing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API