Kroopf v. State

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

A jury convicted David Kroopf of possession of marijuana. The trial court sentenced him to ten years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Kroopf brings three points of error.

In his first point, Kroopf argues the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his conviction. The standard of review of the sufficiency of the evidence is whether, viewing all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt the essential elements of the crime…