Legal Opinion

Salisbury Beach Associates v. Littlefield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 21, 1938Published

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The premises involved in these proceedings consist of a lot of land in Seabrook upon which the defendant has erected build ings. The defendant is in possession under a deed. The plaintiffs have title to Seabrook Beach under a chain which was definitely traced back to a conveyance dated in 1901, and their westerly boundary is the easterly line of the marshes situated westerly of the beach. The tract occupied by the defendant, if marsh-land, does not belong to the plaintiffs. The issue towards which most of the evidence was directed was that concerning the character of this tract. The defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. Davis v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
  3. Paquette v. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  4. Gardner v. Commercial MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  5. Lear v. DurginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API