Salisbury Beach Associates v. Littlefield
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The premises involved in these proceedings consist of a lot of land in Seabrook upon which the defendant has erected build ings. The defendant is in possession under a deed. The plaintiffs have title to Seabrook Beach under a chain which was definitely traced back to a conveyance dated in 1901, and their westerly boundary is the easterly line of the marshes situated westerly of the beach. The tract occupied by the defendant, if marsh-land, does not belong to the plaintiffs. The issue towards which most of the evidence was directed was that concerning the character of this tract. The defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Davis v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
- Paquette v. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- Gardner v. Commercial MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Lear v. DurginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.