Legal Opinion

Link v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from district court, Albany county; M. C. Saufi.ey, Judge. Action of ejectment brought by the Union Pacific Railway Company against Cecilia E. Link. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtConaway, J.

Defendant in error brought its action in the district court for the possession of a part of section 35 in township 16 N., of range 73 W. of the sixth P. M., claiming by virtue of a patent issued to its grantors, of date January 5, 1876. Plaintiff in error claimed the premises in ■controversy by virtue of possession and improvement thereof by her husband and other parties, to whose rights she claims to have succeeded, constituting a claim of some kind under the land laws of the United ¡states. This is claimed to be either a homestead claim, or pre-emption claim, or a bona fide improvement…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moores v. WillsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Patterson v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Galveston Oil Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Blair v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. OttWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hughes v. Cook, Trustee, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Tucker v. Wyoming Coal Mining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API