Legal Opinion
Yniguez v. Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1991No. Nos. 90-15546, 90-15581PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case presents two novel questions concerning post-judgment intervention: first, whether the sponsors of a ballot initiative may intervene after judgment to appeal a decision holding the ballot initiative unconstitutional when the only defendant in the case chooses not to appeal; and second, whether the Attorney General, having argued for and won a dismissal of the suit against him in the district court, may intervene on appeal.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Arizonans for Official English (“AOE”) and its spokesman Robert D. Park campaigned for adoption by ballot…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sierra Club v. Us Environmental Protection Agency, and City of Phoenix, Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Northern Telecom Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.