Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Boehm, J.

Defendant Nationwide issued a policy of automobile insurance to the plaintiffs, New York residents David and Regina Smith, covering their 1973 Cadillac, which was registered and principally garaged in New York. The policy’s endorsements provided uninsured motorist coverage up to $10,000 and economic loss protection up to $50,000.

On August 15, 1982, plaintiffs drove the Cadillac to a campground in the Province of Ontario to vacation with their daughter and son-in-law, Teresa and Joseph O’Shei. On the morning of August 17, 1982, the two couples left the Cadillac…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Vanguard Insurance & PolchlopekNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Allcity Insurance v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Country-Wide Insurance v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Di Stasi v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Sisson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. SybalskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API