Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 30, 1990No. 90-282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant appeals from a denial of his motion for sentence reconsideration. We are called upon to review the propriety of the trial judge engaging in plea bargain discussions with the parties, suggesting a specific plea bargain, which included a set sentence in exchange for a guilty plea, and imposing a larger sentence after defendant rejected the proposed agreement and was found guilty by a jury. Under the facts of this case, we find no error and affirm.

The State has moved to dismiss the appeal because defendant did not appeal the judgment of conviction. We deny the motion because V.R.Cr.P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Jimmy Frank v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Robert HutchingsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Freeman D. Carter, A/K/A Daniel Brady, James Patrick Daly, and William CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Jose Luis Medina-CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. D'AntonioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. In Re FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API