Legal Opinion
Grier v. Goetz
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 7, 2006No. 3:79-3107PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Application For Recovery Of Attorney’s Fees And Expenses As A Prevailing Party (Doc. No. 1310), to which Defendants have responded in opposition (Doc. No. 1320). 1 Plaintiffs request attorney’s fees and expenses for two separate phases of this ongoing litigation: (1) Plaintiffs’ monitoring of the State’s implementation and enforcement of the 2003 Consent Decree, and (2) Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Modify and/or Clarify the Consent Decree.
1. BACKGROUND
On October 1, 2003, this Court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Binta B. Ex Rel. S.A. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Jackson v. Los Lunas CenterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Henri-Duval Winery, LLC v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009