Legal Opinion

Bland v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1954No. 18740PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the evidence amply supports the verdict and there is no merit in the second special ground of the amended motion for new trial, the fate of this case rests entirely upon the first special ground, which complains because, in response to a request by the jury after it had deliberated some time, the judge read and discussed some of the published rules and regulations of the Pardon and Parole Board concerning the granting of paroles and pardons by the board.

Unfortunately, this court has heretofore been unable to render a unanimous decision on this precise question.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Gravett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. McGruder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Graham v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Bland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API