Legal Opinion

Ralph W. Staton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1982No. 80-1744PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

Ralph W. Staton brought this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., to recover damages for the loss of three hunting dogs shot by a park ranger in the Shenandoah National Park. The district court held that the government was exempt from liability under 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a) of the Federal Tort Claims Act because the park ranger had performed a discretionary act under 36 C.F.R. § 2.8(d).

We find that shooting the dogs was not a discretionary act and hold, therefore, that the government is not exempt from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Alex Carl Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michael J. Sutton and John Wiley Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Piechowicz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1988
  3. Bradley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Carmen D. Baxley, Administratrix of the Estate of Alan Douglas Baxley, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. First Nat. Bank of Effingham v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API