Norton v. Scruggs
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Candler. DeKalb superior court. January 4, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
1. Leave extending, from the appearance to the trial term of cases, the right of a particular attorney at law to resist motions to strike petitions or pleas filed by him, did not of itself confer upon him the right at the trial term to amend his pleadings in any case.
2. When, however, the only defect in a plea of non est factum, filed by such attorney at the appearance term, was that the same had not been sworn to, and the plaintiff did not at that term move to strike the plea on this ground, it was erroneous, when such a motion was made at the trial term, not to allow the plea to be amended…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ward v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Ford v. Serenado Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Bland v. BirdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Citizens & Southern Bank v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917