Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of Texas v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). Appellant insists that the court should have given the requested peremptory instruction to the jury, and that the judgment should be reversed and rendered on appeal for the following reasons: (1) The alleged nuisance being only temporary, and the suit being only for permanent injuries to his premises, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. (2) The cause of the alleged nuisance, and the nuisance, was shown to have existed more than two years prior to the filing of the suit, and the suit was therefore barred by limitation. (3) The company, being a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OakesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Hargreaves v. KimberlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Baugh v. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Texas & Sabine Railway Co. v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cosden Oil Co. v. SidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Williams v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- American Cyanamid Company v. M. G. SpartoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- City of Fort Worth v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. MuncyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.