Meilman v. State

ON MOTION TO REVIEW DENIAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND

At issue is the propriety of the trial court’s denial of a motion to set a superse-deas bond. We reverse. ■

Defendant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere specifically reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. Upon filing the notice of appeal, defendant requested a supersedeas bond. Initially, the state indicated that it was not opposed. to a supersedeas bond, but then seemed to change its position as the hearing progressed. The trial court ultimately denied the motion, basing its decision on the fact that the defendant had…