Scanlan v. US, STATE FARM INS. CO.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is a motion filed by defendants the United States of America and John Kupiec to dismiss Plaintiffs two-count Amended Complaint, both for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). For the reasons explained below, the Court 1) finds that it has jurisdiction; 2) finds that Count I states a claim for relief against the United States; 3) denies Plaintiffs request for rule 60(b) relief; 4) finds that Count II states…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Evers v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ava Marquitsha Teverbaugh Steele v. United States of America, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025