Herrold v. Union Township Poor District
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 21, March T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. Snyder Co., June T., 1902, No. 89, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Catherine Herrold v. The Union Township Poor District. Rule to open judgment. Before McClttbe, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
On March 22, 1900, J. B. Herrold and George M. Herrold, were the overseers of the poor of Union township and on that day they borrowed from Catherine Herrold, plaintiff, the sum of $600 giving her therefor a judgment note, signed by them as overseer of the poor of said district. The note was due in one year after date, with interest. The learned court below has found,-on ample evidence, that this money was actually furnished by the plaintiff and that it was used to pay pressing claims against the poor district, and that there was no fraud or collusion in the matter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradford v. New York & Pennsylvania Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Gibson v. Poor Dist. of Plumcreek Tp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Good Roads Machinery Co. v. Old Lycoming TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roundsley v. Tuscarora Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911