Legal Opinion
Kozec v. Murphy (In re Murphy)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided June 27, 2017No. CASE NO. 15-06918-5-DMW; ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO. 16-00024-5-DMWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
David M. Warren, United States Bankruptcy Judge
This matter comes before the court upon the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Kristen Anne Murphy (“Defendant”) on March 20, 2017 and the Re*405sponse to Motion to Dismiss (“Response”) filed by Robert Richard Kozec, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) on April 20, 2017. After a review of the Motion to Dismiss, Response, and applicable law, the court finds the matter ripe for adjudication without the need for a hearing and makes the following findings of facts and conclusions…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Akil Management Services B v. v. Parhelion IncorporatedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Trahant v. MintzDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023