Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1957No. 1786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Judge.

This was a prosecution for an indecent assault upon a police officer. The charge was brought under our assault statute. Code 1951, § 22-504. Defendant waived his right to a jury, and was tried by the court and found guilty. The trial judge imposed no sentence, but took defendant’s personal recognizance or bond not to repeat the offense. 1 Defendant has brought the case here on appeal.

The Government, though conceding that there is an appealable conviction, has moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that defendant’s remedy was not by appeal of right but by application.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Langley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Clayton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Matter of SiracusaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In the Matter of SiracusaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. McDonald v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API