Kirkland v. Hepselgefser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler county.
1Opinion of the Court
The following syllabi is the verbatim opinion of the court, delivered December 18, 1853, by
Black, J.
— The legal propositions on which this judgment must stand affirmed, need only to be stated. They are as follows :—
1. Articles of agreement executed by a husband and wife, for the sale of the wife’s land, are of no validity, and convey no title whatever to her estate, in law or equity, without an acknowledgment, agreeably to the Act of 1770. .
2. A subsequent deed by the husband and wife to another person, acknowledged legally, will convey the title to the whole estate, just as if the previous…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Glidden v. StruplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Innis v. TempletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Danner v. BertholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882