Legal Opinion

Harris v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.

Is a letter written by the attorneys for the executors of an estate, authorizing a real estate agent to sell land belonging to the, estate, sufficient evidence of agency to bind the estate in the absence of proof of either express or implied authority conferred upon the executors to sell and convey real property?

At the outset the plaintiff knew that he was dealing with the representatives of a dead man, and consequently the law imposed upon him the duty of ascertaining the extent of the authority of the parties to dispose of tbe real estate. The power of personal representatives to contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Hardy v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Powell v. . WoodcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Raleigh Real Estate & Trust Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API