Srebnick v. State

OPINION OF THE COURT

This is an appeal of a finding of guilty of noncriminal infraction of speeding. The appellant contends that the radar evidence was inadmis*133sible pursuant to F.S. § 316.1906(c), (d) and (e) which provide as requirements that the radar unit make a clear assignment of speed to a single vehicle, the radar be operated with audio Doppler engaged, and that the radar have no automatic speed locks and no audio alarms, unless disconnected or deactivated. The appellant argues that the learned trial judge erred in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal based on the testimony of…