Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Election Contest of Stamos v. Gray

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1936No. 43246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

At the November election in 1934, there were three candidates for a membership on the board of supervisors of Appanoose county: Harry Stamos, Joe Gray, and Harry Stickler. The official canvassing board determined that Gray had a majority of 15 votes over Stamos, and that Stickler had fewer votes than either Stamos or Gray. In due time and form, Stamos instituted a contest against Gray. This contest in due time came on for hearing in the form and manner provided by law, and the contest board made a finding in which, among other things, it found that Stamos had a majority of 54 votes over Gray;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davenport v. OlerichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Mentzer v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. DeLong v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Murphy v. LentzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Furguson v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devine v. WonderlichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Steeves v. New MarketSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Wiedenheft v. FrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API