Pettit Motor Company v. Pettit
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Justice.
This is the second petition to review an .■award involved in this case. The first was • disposed of in Pettit Motor Company et al. t. Pettit et al., Okl., 353 P.2d 20, 22. The ■record discloses that James A. Pettit, hereinafter called claimant, sustained an acci- ■ dental injury resulting in hernia. Before this hernia was repaired he sustained a second accidental injury resulting in disability -.to his leg. In Pettit Motor Company v. Pettit, supra, an award was vacated. In discussing the merits of the case it is stated:
“It is readily conceivable that an employee could sustain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Wilson Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- United Service Street Car Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Sheldon Oil Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilkerson Chevrolet, Inc. v. MacKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Aldridge Hotel v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966