Legal Opinion

Pettit Motor Company v. Pettit

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1961No. 39434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

This is the second petition to review an .■award involved in this case. The first was • disposed of in Pettit Motor Company et al. t. Pettit et al., Okl., 353 P.2d 20, 22. The ■record discloses that James A. Pettit, hereinafter called claimant, sustained an acci- ■ dental injury resulting in hernia. Before this hernia was repaired he sustained a second accidental injury resulting in disability -.to his leg. In Pettit Motor Company v. Pettit, supra, an award was vacated. In discussing the merits of the case it is stated:

“It is readily conceivable that an employee could sustain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Wilson Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. United Service Street Car Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Sheldon Oil Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilkerson Chevrolet, Inc. v. MacKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Aldridge Hotel v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API