Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hayward v. Kalamazoo Stove Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1939No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 40,302Published

1DissentWiest, J.

I do not concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Potter.

The award should be vacated.

Plaintiff was injured August 6, 1936. An award was by approved agreement. Pinal settlement receipt was approved December 29, 1936. In that receipt plaintiff stated :

“I have fully recovered from all disability on account of this accident. I returned to work on the 16th day of December, 1936, at a wage of $31.20 per week and I understand that all compensation is now stopped and that I will have to show a change for the worse that has lessened my earning capacity before I will be entitled to further compensation.”

Pla…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Butler v. MillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API