Sewell v. Edmonston
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in the Supreme Court. At February Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Chief Justice.
A motion was made to dismiss this case, on the ground that the bill of exceptions to the refusal of the injunction prayed for was signed and certified on the 8th of November, and the judgment complained of was rendered on *354the 7th of October, 1880, more than twenty days before. It was replied that one of the counsel for the respondent had waived the defect, and that the judge certified that he left home on the day when the decision was rendered and did not return home until the 8th of November.
The reason assigned does not cure the lateness of the cei'tificate on a fast…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Engel v. SpeerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grace v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- O'Donnell v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1925