Legal Opinion
Wootten v. Ivey
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 19, 2003No. 1011384, 1011385PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jeffrey Wootten, Marty Wootten, and Gold Kist, Inc., appeal from an order of the DeKalb Circuit Court restraining and enjoining them from restocking their hog farm pending the submission of an odor-management plan that meets the court's approval. We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural Background
On September 7, 1999, Toney Ivey, Brenda Ivey, and Casey Ivey sued Jeffrey Wootten, Marty Wootten, and Gold Kist, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendants"), alleging that their land had been damaged as a result of the defendants' operation of a hog farm near the Iveys'…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alford v. State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Montgomery & Florida Railway Co. v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Tillery v. Commercial Nat. Bank of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Cochran v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Van Hoof v. Van HoofSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Demetrius Avery Jackson, Jr. v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.