In Re Any & All Funds or Other Assets in Brown Bros. Harriman & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Before the Court is the government’s application for a 10-day temporary restraining order. 1 To rule on that application, the Court must resolve a matter of first impression: the interpretation of a statute that gives federal courts jurisdiction to restrain property “subject to a foreign forfeiture or confiscation judgment.” 28 U.S.C. § 2467(d)(3). The Opportunity Fund (“Fund”), a target of the restraining order sought here, has objected to the government’s application. The Fund is restrained by three orders currently in place and would also be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hitkansut LLC, a Michigan Corporation, & Acceledyne Technologies, Ltd., LLC, a Michigan Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Embassy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Ephraim Emeka UgwuonyeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hitkansut LLC, a Michigan Corporation, & Acceledyne Technologies, Ltd., LLC, a Michigan Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- In Re All Assets Held in Account Jw3083094 in the Name of Carinalli, S.A. at Jefferies, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- In Re Contents in Citibank Account No. Held by Rouz USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010