Legal Opinion

Associated Wholesale Electric Co. v. S. H. Kress & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1936No. Civ. No. 10779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

— Plaintiff furnished to defendant Bert L. Perry, Inc., a subcontractor, materials to be used in a building constructed for defendant S. H. Kress & Com*593pany, as owner, by defendant Clinton Construction Company, as general contractor. Defendant Perry failed to pay for such materials and was adjudicated a bankrupt. Plaintiff thereupon filed suit to foreclose his mechanic’s lien and recovered judgment of foreclosure against the property of defendant Kress, with the provision that should deficiency arise upon the sale on foreclosure, judgment for such deficiency should be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Combs v. EberhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Tyler v. J. I. Mitrovich Bldg. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Culjak v. Better Built Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Rodoni v. Harbor EngineersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. Jack Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Vowels v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Dong Yang Corp. v. G.C. CorporationSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API