Legal Opinion

Clavarie & Noble v. Waggaman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1881No. 39PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Sixth District Court. Bightor, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGloin, J.

Concerning the facts in this case, as set out in the petition, there is no dispute. The question of law involved is, whether the civil sheriff of this parish was justified in releasing from seizure the steamboat Seminole, which he had taken under a writ of sequestration, basing his action upon plaintiff’s neglect to furnish bond of indemnity demanded under section 3579 Bevised Statutes. That section authorizes sheriffs who have seized, or maybe required to seize, personal property, “by virtue of any mesne or final process, to demand, when such property is claimed by a third person, a bond of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Driggs v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
  2. Hill v. BowmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  3. M'Donough v. ZacharieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  4. Crumlich v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giangrosso v. StraubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Morere v. Howard Odorless Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API