Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 3, 1941No. 38Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

311 U.S. 544 (1941)

PALMER ET AL., TRUSTEES,

v.

CONNECTICUT RAILWAY & LIGHTING CO.

No. 38.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 15, 1940.

Decided January 6, 1941.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Mr. James Garfield, with whom Mr. Hermon J. Wells was on the brief, for petitioners.

Mr. George W. Martin for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · ReedJustice Reed

This certiorari, which we allowed because of its importance, involves problems of proving a lessor's claim for damages for rejection of its lease in a proceeding under § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act. The lease, demising respondent's street railway…

Also in this document: Dissent · Frankfurter; Dissent · Douglas.

3Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API