Legal Opinion

Rosewell v. LaSalle-Lake Investors

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1982No. 80-1862PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JOHNSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

LaSalle-Lake Investors objected to the increased valuation of its property in a nonquadrennial year by the Cook County assessor on the grounds that the assessor had not afforded notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to the increase. In its order of judgment, the trial court denied the objection, finding that an increase notice had been mailed and that the assessor had afforded LaSalle-Lake notice and an opportunity to be heard. The issue presented for review is whether the trial court erred in holding that the required…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Draper v. Franz, Naughton & LeahyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Exchange National Bank v. CullertonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Lindheimer v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Owl Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buck v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API