Legal Opinion

Jordan v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1934No. 4603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

As stated in our original opinion, the issues in this case are those of consideration for the assignment and its effect.

Upon a re-examination , of the record we are now satisfied that the payment by the assignee of the note given by the insured for the first premium was a valid and a contemplated consideration for the assignment. The evidence shows that this note was not' paid for the insured, but as a part of the obligation of the assignee under the assignment. As there was no debt or obligation owing to the assignee by the insured, the assignment could not have been intended…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1938
  2. Jordan v. New York Life Ins. CoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API