Legal Opinion

Halstead v. Nelson

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1885Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment, entered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried* January 19, 1878, some person mailed do defendant’s wife a printed paper recommending and advertising articles for the prevention of conception and for procuring abortions, and stating where the articles could be purchased.

Read the full summary

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment, entered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried* January 19, 1878, some person mailed do defendant’s wife a printed paper recommending and advertising articles for the prevention of conception and for procuring abortions, and stating where the articles could be purchased. A few recommendatory words were written in pencil on Dhe paper, and the written and printed matter was signed in pencil, “ a lady friend.” The complaint contains three counts:…

1Opinion of the Court

Follett, J.:

Mailing a circular of tbe kind described in tbe statement of facts ■was, in 1878, an indictable misdemeanor by the laws of this State (chap. 717, § 2, Laws 1872, since made a part of the Penal Code, §§ 318, 319), and by the laws of the United States (U. S. P. S. [2d ed.], § 3893). Charging a person with the commission of an indictable offense involving moral turpitude, is slander per se. (Young v. Miller, 3 Hill, 21; Towns. Sl. and Lib., § 154; Folkard’s Starkie on Sland. and Libel, chap. 2, § 14.)

We think it cannot be questioned that the commission of the offense charged involves…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carl v. . AyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Van Wyck v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Howard v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Mitchell v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Maria De La Solidad De Arguello and v. The United States. The United States v. Maria De La Solidad De ArguelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API