Legal Opinion
Tyrone Grayson v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 2016No. 67A01-1511-MI-1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAIDIK, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
[1] The Indiana Parole Board alleged that Tyrone Grayson violated his parole by committing a new offense. The parole board alleged that Grayson was on parole for one particular sentence when he committed the new offense. After Grayson’s parole was revoked, he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was not on parole for that sentence when he committed the new offense. Realizing a mistake in the records, the Indiana Department of Correction fixed the records to show that Grayson was on parole for a different sentence when he committed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hardley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hawkins v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Partlow v. Superintendent, Miami Correctional FacilityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- COUSINS v. SMITHDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- James Stephens v. Brian Smith (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- James W. Baker, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- John Gates v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.