Legal Opinion
State v. Ospina
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1992No. Nos. 91AP-1060, 91AP-1061PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCormac, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Joaquin Ospina, appeals his convictions in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas of two counts of trafficking in drugs for his possession and sale of cocaine in an amount equal to or greater than one hundred times the bulk amount in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(9) and (10). Appellant assigns three errors as follows:
“First Assignment of Error
“Plain error, contra the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, occurs when a confidential informant, who is an active participant in a drug transaction, does not testify at trial involving the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Caver, 91443 (3-19-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Graber, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Stark County2003
- State v. Whiteside, 08ap-602 (4-23-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. A.W.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.