Legal Opinion

Cluett v. Department of Professional Regulation, Florida Real Estate Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1988No. BQ-134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

SHIVERS, Judge.

The issue in this case is the propriety of the Real Estate Commission’s (Commission) order denying appellant’s Second Amended Motion for Reconsideration. Upon review of the record in this case, we reverse the Commission’s decision and remand this case to the hearing officer for a new hearing based on all the available evidence.

The dispute in this case originated when Beverly Lockner and her husband entered into a contract with Pamela J. Darr and her husband by which the Lockners were to buy the Darrs’ house in Fort Myers, Florida.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dade National Bank of Miami v. KayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Cradock v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Roberto v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Langer v. LangerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Mazurek v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Division of Real EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API