Legal Opinion

Hudson v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1927No. 757-7620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

We are asked to grant a rehearing herein because the opinion of the Commission was written by a judge who was not present and did not sit with the commission when the case was submitted on oral argument, the contention being that, while there is no rule to that effect, nevertheless, the opinion of a court should not be written by a judge who was not present at the submission upon oral arguments. This complaint involves a mild indictment of our system, inasmuch as the law contemplates, in all cases referred to the Commission of Appeals, the Supreme Court will decide the case without having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. WaltersTexas Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. C.F. Bent Tree Apartment Ltd. Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. HudsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Robert Andrew Mansfield v. C.F. Bent Tree Apartment Limited Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API