Legal Opinion

Lindbladh Corp. v. C. E. Sheppard Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1933No. 5950Published

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit in which infringement is alleged of letters patent No. 1,813,940 for a ruling machine granted July 14,1931, on an application filed on September 17, 1921, and of patent No. 1,609,648 for a ruling apparatus granted December 7, 1926, on an application filed August 3, 1923. The inventor of these devices is Harmon E. Lind-bladh, plaintiff’s assignor.

The inventions covered by these patents relate to improvements in duplex ruling machines, in which sheets, after having parallel *447lines drawn, parallel to one another and to the edges of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API