Legal Opinion

Peters v. Randall

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1915No. 6399Published

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division /£C,” 'No. 101,837. Honorable E. K. Skinner, Judge.

1Opinion

On The Merits.

The merits of the case are thus disposed of by our able brother of the District Court:

“Common every day equity and'justice are with the plaintiff.
“It appears that the defendant was married to an irresponsible and impecunious absentee.
“She employed counsel to obtain from a worthless husband whose title of head and master of the community is a keen sarcasm.
“The services were rendered to her, and she profited by them, in the same way and to the same extent that she would in the purchase of household supplies.
“I see no distinction in her liability when she personally receives the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benedict v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  2. Crow v. YocomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API