Legal Opinion

Archer v. . Joyner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Civil actioN, from NORTHAMPTON, beard, on return to preliminary restraining order, before Cooke, J., bolding courts of tbe Third Judicial District, on 16 November, 1916. There was judgment dissolving tbe restraining order and dismissing tbe action as to plaintiff’s right to recover, and plaintiffs excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

On tbe bearing it appeared, among other things, that tbe State Legislature of 1915 passed an act putting seven townships in Northampton County under tbe stock law, tbe same being chapter 448, Public Laws 1915, and designated by common consent as tbe “Mason law,” after the distinguished author of tbe bill, then a representative of said county. - By a subsequent act, chapter 768, Public-Local Laws 1915, the township of Roanoke was withdrawn from the provisions of the first statute. The act declares that the townships included shall be under the provisions of the stock law as therein contained,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harper v. Commissioners of New Hanover CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. State v. . TweedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Jones v. Duncan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Aydlett v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faison v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Marshburn v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API