Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Azima

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1995No. 94-1324PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we determine whether an insurance carrier gave a policyholder its written consent to sue an uninsured motorist in a subrogation letter it sent to the policyholder. Because we hold that the subrogation letter is no evidence that the carrier consented to the policyholder’s suit, a majority of the Court reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and affirms the judgment of the trial court.

The policyholder, Jasmine Azima, alleged that she suffered injuries as a result of an automobile accident caused by the negligence of Frederick Sturdivant, an uninsured motorist. Azima’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Azima v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Texas Utilities Electric Co. v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Fazakerly v. Fazakerly, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1999
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Daniel Wes IrwinTexas Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API