Legal Opinion
Beard v. County of Stanislaus
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 20, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00841Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-ADA-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS 13 v. ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF; PERMISSION TO FILE MOTION FOR 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., CONTEMPT/SANCTIONS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY 15 Defendants. ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 16, 2022 16 HEARING 17 (ECF No. 47) 18 19 20 I. 21 INTRODUCTION 22 Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this 23 action on May 24, 2021. (ECF No. 1.)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.