Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cullen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1959No. 6 Div. 190PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, recovered verdict and judgment for five thousand dollars for personal injury and property damage arising out of an automobile collision at a street intersection in Birmingham.

The complaint contained two counts, one charging negligence and the other wanton misconduct by the defendant. Motion for new trial was overruled.

Defendant argues three propositions to show error, to wit: (1) that the court erred in refusing the affirmative charge for defendant as to the wanton count, (2) that the court erred in overruling motion for new trial on ground that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Gulf, M. O. R. Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. English v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Aircraft Sales & Service, Inc. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hicks v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. South Highlands Infirmary v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Hornady Truck Line, Inc. v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Jack Cole Co. v. HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Mink v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API