Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Rowland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1888No. 2461PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Burleson. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

The decision of this case depends upon the determination of the question of the constitu-. tionality of the act of March 23, 1887, which provides that all railroad companies which had theretofore, or which may thereafter “fence their right of way may be required to make openings or crossings through their fence and over their road bed along their right of way every one and a half miles thereof;” *301and "if such fence shall divide any inclosure, that at least one opening- shall be made in said fence within such inclosure.” (Laws Twentieth Leg., p. 39.) Appellee was the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Town of Lake View v. Rose Hill Cemetery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Quackenbush v. Wisconsin & Minnesota RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. MowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. WillenborgIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Mitchell v. CastellawTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. O'DonnellTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. Black Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API